legal · medical_disclaimer
A word about what you'll read here
Last updated . Read this once before you act on anything we publish — it frames everything else on the site.
We write to inform, not to treat
The NAD Review is a publication about NAD+, its precursors, and the wider science of healthy aging. Everything you find here — our reviews, explainers, dosage tools, and provider rankings — exists for general educational purposes. It is journalism and research commentary, not a diagnosis, a prescription, or a personalized treatment plan. Reading it does not create a clinician–patient relationship between you and anyone at The NAD Review, and nothing here should be mistaken for the tailored guidance only your own clinician can give.
Talk to a licensed clinician first
Before you start, stop, or change any NAD+ protocol, supplement, peptide, or medical treatment, speak with a licensed healthcare professional who knows your history, your medications, and your goals. What we describe in the abstract can behave very differently once it meets a real body, a real prescription list, or a real condition. If something we wrote nudges you toward a change, treat that as a prompt to ask a qualified person — never as the green light itself.
Your results are your own
Longevity science deals in averages and probabilities, and you are neither. Genetics, age, baseline health, dose, formulation, and plain luck all shift how any intervention plays out, so individual results vary — sometimes widely. An outcome reported in a trial, a testimonial, or one of our reviews is a data point, not a promise about what will happen to you.
What supplements, peptides, and NAD+ products actually are
The categories we cover carry caveats worth stating plainly. Most dietary supplements — including NAD+ precursors such as NMN and NR — are not reviewed by the FDA the way drugs are, and they are not evaluated or approved to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. When a product is a compounded or prescription formulation (injectable NAD+ and many peptide therapies fall here, as do compounded GLP-1 medications offered by some clinics, to name just one example), it belongs in the hands of a licensed prescriber who has evaluated you first. And anything sold as “research use only” is exactly that: material whose human evidence is often thin and whose legal status for personal use can be murky. We report on these things because they are part of the landscape, not because we are recommending you obtain or use them.
Third-party information isn't our endorsement
We cite studies, quote vendors, and link to providers so you can follow the trail yourself. Naming a clinic, product, or study is not an endorsement, and we don't control the accuracy of what those third parties publish about their own offerings. Prices, labels, formulations, and trial findings also shift over time, so while we work hard to source every claim, we can't guarantee that everything here is complete, current, or free of error.
In an emergency, skip the reading
If you think you're having a medical emergency, call 911 or your local emergency number right away. Don't delay care or ignore professional advice because of something you read on this site. For the terms that govern your use of The NAD Review more broadly, see our terms of service.